![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Preliminary analysis and testingA preliminary LUSAS analysis of the core at an early stage of its development was carried out to find its Ultimate Limit State and to see if the proposed method of design and analysis needed to be re-assessed. In modelling the structure, 2 engineering beam elements were used for each tetrahedral member and the castings were modelled using a separate beam element for each leg joint. A single tetrahedral unit was built and load tested to failure by the fabricators, Tubeworkers (Structures) Ltd. This unit was also modelled, loaded and analysed in LUSAS. The results correlated extremely well, showing the same failure mechanism, and verified the proposed modelling approach. Prior to the full development of the structure, a trial assembly of 10 tetrahedra in a pyramid of 3 layers was performed to prove both the construction sequence and the accuracy of the fabricated components. This confirmed that the designer's methodology was suitable. Structural development and the exchange of project dataIn a series of iterative processes the final form gradually began to evolve. The LUSAS web site was used as a live communication tool by the project partners to exchange data and view proposed designs. Ray traced images and VRML models of potential structural forms, created by using the LUSAS Programmable Interface (LPI), were put onto the web site to allow the sculptor to examine the structure from every conceivable angle, and to make suggestions for improvements. This totally eliminated the 'paper copy' approach and helped to speed-up the development process enormously. Structural analysisFor each re-development of the tendril region, wind assessment with a 25 year return period was carried out to BS6399 : Part 2 : 1995, The Code of Practice for Wind Loading, to see how dense the cloud could be built. The wind loading assessments provided a set of equivalent loads which were applied to the core members in the LUSAS model for each of the eigenvalue and nonlinear analyses of the structure. Applying equivalent loads in this way reduced the model size and helped to speed-up the solution times. At every project landmark, eigenvalue analyses of the whole structure
were carried out to assess likely wind induced oscillations. In addition, a detailed
analysis of one of the longest tendrils was done using full wind loading acting as a
dynamic pressure to evaluate the bending moments at the bolted connections. Once all
aspects of the structure had been approved a final, more rigorous, elasto-plastic analysis
was performed with the certified higher strength steel members in those regions where the
earlier analyses had indicated high stress concentrations. In carrying out the wind assessment, two shielding calculations were performed. The empirical method of Eden, Butler and Patient was used initially to calculate the "total" solidity of the frame. This method sums the projected areas of all members and divides by the total envelope area. A more rigorous shielding analysis method for multiple plane frames was also used as described in "The Designers Guide to Wind Loading of Building Structures, Part 2: Static Structures". This method divides the space envelope of the sculpture into 1m3 zones. The layers normal to the wind were considered as "plane frames" positioned at the centre of the layer, and the system was analysed as a series of 17 frames. Each 1m2 of cell on elevation was treated separately so that the variation of solidity on elevation could be captured. The shielding effect of upstream frames was computed using a summation method, leading to a build-up of shielding on the downwind frames. In fact, the members at the back of the densified zone are almost totally shielded. In both cases, a complete model of the sculpture was used for calculations, in which, structural core, body form, and tendril expansion zones were included. It provided a reasonable basis for the assessment of solidity through the structure for the most onerous condition of a face-on wind. ResultsUsing the comprehensive results processing facilities in
LUSAS, maximum and minimum envelopes of factored dead and wind loading were defined and
the results were selected for viewing. The Groups facility was of particular use in this
analysis where the structure is so complex and plotted values cannot be easily seen. The
use of Groups allowed the results for a particular layer or region of the structure to be
looked at in isolation, as for example, for each layer of the structural core where a
force/moment diagram was plotted to show stresses and bending moments in each of the
tetrahedral members.
ConclusionsThe use of innovative engineering ideas from all members of the project team, FEA's skill in producing complex custom software to grow and develop potential structural forms, and the use of LUSAS Civil and Structural analysis software to model and prove the structural integrity of the sculpture, ensured that the design and analysis of a complex structure was completed to the sculptor's satisfaction in a very tight timescale. Antony Gormley, in realising his vision, said, "Quantum Cloud is a project that can only be realised with digital design systems and I am very fortunate to have collaborated with energetic and ground-breaking engineers. The result, a combination of art and technology, will be a monument to the future, expressing the potential of the human being at the end of the twentieth century."
|
![]() |